Slate has wonderful article about a professors choice to use (or not to use) technology in learning.
The article resonates with me on many levels. As I reflect on the SAMR model of technology use and learning, I see many cases where technology use really doesn't benefit student learning. And I believe this question, does this use of technology benefit student learning must be central in our thinking to use it. I've also seen technology use that fantastically improves on the way students learn - but this has more to do with instructional design rather than the actual blinking thing.
There is nothing automatically better about learning when we throw technology in the mix. We must carefully judge and balance the benefits of technology in learning. This requires time, testing, and a clear vision of your learning outcomes.
A last point about distraction. As I work in ed-tech, I see more and more how distraction and divided attention fractures and fragments learning. I believe a great gift teachers can give to their students is the experience of deep thinking. To spend a significant amount of time deeply knowing a poem or a part of a song is to know the "truth of a thing". And isn't that why we teach and learn?
Sometimes I worry that technology makes knowing the truth harder. There are all kinds of yucky implications about a generation of kids who blink from one thing to the next, but that's a discussion for another article.
Great article in the ongoing conversation about technology use and learning.
Published on Sunday, November 02, 2014 (about 4 years, 3 months, and 3 weeks ago). Posted in: Educational Tech Design